An argument against the united states goals in the war on terror

Atlantic slave trade[ edit ] Reproduction of a handbill advertising a slave auction in Charleston, South Carolinain The Atlantic slave trade had an economic foundation. The dominant ideology among the European elite who structured national policy throughout the age of the Atlantic slave trade was mercantilismthe belief that national policy should be centered around amassing military power and economic wealth.

An argument against the united states goals in the war on terror

The targeted elimination of US citizen and radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki for his alleged role as a terrorist affiliate raises troubling international legal questions. This article however highlights how the extra-judicial killing of bin Laden by the US military undermines the rule of law and paints an ugly picture of the Obama administration.

Open Democracy U. Reports Mixed Results on Afghan Poppy Crops September 30, Afghanistan modestly reduced its poppy cultivation this year in Helmand province though nationwide production has remained the same or increased.

The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime reports that the decrease is mainly the result of blight, despite a government initiative and Western aid. The report states that increasing poppy prices could undercut the efforts to reduce cultivation in the coming year. Nearly all cultivation occurs in the country's least secure provinces.

In this article from Al Jazeera, Mark Levine argues that if a peaceful future is to be secured for Pakistan and the wider world, relief aid is an ill advised area for the US to be fiscally prudent.

He suggests the US "war on terror" needs to be fundamentally rethought to consider relief, rebuilding and the struggle against poverty and hardship.

And in the "multigenerational" campaign against Al-Qaida, more resources should be allocated towards reconstruction, than are used for purposes of destruction. Al Jazeera The Secret Killers: Wikileaks has published the mass of secret U.

Military experts are disquieted by the creation of such global hunter-killer teams who regularly kill civilians in their raids on supposed "targets.

An argument against the united states goals in the war on terror

The United States has increased military and intelligence operations in a dozen countries. These shadow wars have fuelled anti-American rage; blurred the lines between soldiers and spies;weakened Congressional oversight and led to a reliance on authoritarian foreign leader. They were transferred to a CIA "black site" for two years of interrogation, during which time they could not speak with attorneys or human rights observers.

The AP discovered that top White House, Justice Department, Pentagon and CIA officials were involved in the prisoner transfer, which law professor Jonathon Hafetz called "a shell game to hide detainees from the courts.

The cover's title suggested that such crimes against women would increase if the US-led military force were to leave Afghanistan prematurely. Many have claimed that TIME engaged in "emotional blackmail" and exploited "gender politics to pitch for the status quo-a continued US military involvement.

Recent Opinions

Telling Aisha's story may raise awareness about the plight of women in Afghanistan, but drawing a connection between her situation and the US occupation is both inaccurate and manipulative. BBC The Guantanamo Paradox August 6, More than men who have not been convicted, or in some cases even charged with a criminal offense, are being kept in indefinite detention in Guantanamo Bay.

As the Obama administration moves forward with the military trials at the detention facility, it is difficult to see how the President is fulfilling his commitment to "re-establishing our [US] credibility as a nation committed to the rule of law.

The maintenance of Guantanamo is just one of the ways in which this administration continues to resemble that of George W. Crimes of War Project Western Wars Vs Muslim Women August 5, The Time Magazine's cover story on the plight of Afghan women contributes to justifying the war on humanitarian "civilizing" grounds instead of criticizing it on the same grounds.

Military solutions to social problems fail to make the distinction between Islam and the Taliban or explain how women's rights can be attained by such means. This author suggests that "the war to liberate the women of Afghanistan," is more concerned with promoting "men's wars" rather than women's rights, whilst Muslim women are being progressively silenced in this discursive battle.

Although driven by contrasting ideologies, both serve to further disempower women from decision making. Security Council Resolution highlighted the contributions that women can make to conflict prevention and resolution, peacekeeping and peacebuilding.

Yet this suppression of female agency in Pakistan denies the importance of women's equal and full participation as active agents in peace and security. The image is intended to remind the reader of "what happens if we leave Afghanistan.

However, despite the lofty rhetoric about "freeing" the women of Afghanistan, the US-supported government of Hamid Karzai has not implemented policies to help women in any substantial way. In this Brave New Films video, numerous experts show that conditions for women have actually deteriorated as a result of the US-led occupation.For decades, the United States and our friends abroad have waged the long struggle against the terrorist menace.

We have learned much from these efforts. Even as we experience success in the war on terrorism, new enemies may emerge. Thus, the United States will confront the threat of terrorism for the foreseeable future.

Activists and a war monitoring group say Syrian government and Russian warplanes have targeted the southern edge of Idlib province with a series of. If the U.S. remains in this war on terror, then the war will NEVER END.

Former U.S.

Big Issues

President George W. Bush talked about the goals of the "war on terror" in a September 20, speech, in which he said it "will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated.".

The Racist Roots of Gun Control. The historical record provides compelling evidence that racism underlies gun control laws -- and not in any subtle way. Racism in the United States has been widespread since the colonial attheheels.comy or socially sanctioned privileges and rights were given to white Americans but denied to all other races.

regime fell in , the United States, with its coalition partners, continued to take military action in Iraq under the AUMF to further these purposes, including action against AQI [Al-Qaeda in Iraq], which then, as now, posed a terrorist threat to the United States and its partners and undermined stability and democracy in Iraq. For decades, the United States and our friends abroad have waged the long struggle against the terrorist menace. We have learned much from these efforts. Even as we experience success in the war on terrorism, new enemies may emerge. Thus, the United States will confront the threat of terrorism for the foreseeable future. The shadow “war against terrorism” began in the Bush administration but expanded under President Obama, who ironically became popular due to his early opposition to the invasion of Iraq. The United States has increased military and intelligence operations in a dozen countries.

European Americans (particularly affluent white Anglo-Saxon Protestants) were granted exclusive privileges in matters of education, immigration, voting rights, citizenship, land acquisition, and criminal. Opposition to United States involvement in the Vietnam War began with demonstrations in against the escalating role of the U.S.

An argument against the united states goals in the war on terror

military in the Vietnam War and grew into a broad social movement over the ensuing several years. This movement informed and helped shape the vigorous and polarizing debate, primarily in the United States, during the second half of the s and early s .

Lifting the Veil